<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>LIKELIHOOD OF CONFUSION®</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.likelihoodofconfusion.com/?feed=rss2" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.likelihoodofconfusion.com</link>
	<description>Blog on trademark, copyright, Internet law and free speech</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 01 Sep 2010 22:54:26 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Rosetta Stone v. Google:  Lost in translation</title>
		<link>http://www.likelihoodofconfusion.com/?p=6507&amp;utm_source=rss&amp;utm_medium=rss&amp;utm_campaign=no-rosetta-stone-this-opinion</link>
		<comments>http://www.likelihoodofconfusion.com/?p=6507#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 01 Sep 2010 22:07:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Jane Coleman</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Trademark Law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Rosetta Stone]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Rosetta Stone v. Google]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Secondary Trademark Liability]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.likelihoodofconfusion.com/?p=6507</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[When courts consider search engine company liability for trademark infringement, whether direct or indirect, they typically focus on the sale of “trademarked” keywords, or search terms, to third parties for use in advertising and directing internet traffic to websites that compete with the trademark owner, as recently demonstrated in Rescuecom v. Google. If such use [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.likelihoodofconfusion.com/?feed=rss2&amp;p=6507</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Grey is OK</title>
		<link>http://www.likelihoodofconfusion.com/?p=425&amp;utm_source=rss&amp;utm_medium=rss&amp;utm_campaign=grey-is-ok</link>
		<comments>http://www.likelihoodofconfusion.com/?p=425#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 30 Aug 2010 15:23:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Ron Coleman</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[LIKELIHOOD OF CONFUSION®]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.likelihoodofconfusion.com/?p=425</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Originally posted 2006-04-05 12:48:34. Republished by Blog Post Promoter The Business Review (Albany) reports (reg. required) on what could be a very important decision relating to the importation of grey goods: The U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit has directed the U.S. International Trade Commission to reconsider its ruling prohibiting domestic sales of [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.likelihoodofconfusion.com/?feed=rss2&amp;p=425</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Not safe for work</title>
		<link>http://www.likelihoodofconfusion.com/?p=6503&amp;utm_source=rss&amp;utm_medium=rss&amp;utm_campaign=not-safe-for-work</link>
		<comments>http://www.likelihoodofconfusion.com/?p=6503#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 30 Aug 2010 15:23:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Ron Coleman</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Blogging]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Roundups]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Blawg Reviews]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.likelihoodofconfusion.com/?p=6503</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Blawg Review #279 is up at Mirriam Seddiq&#8217;s Not Guilty blog. It&#8217;s not safe for work.  Unless you work in a law office. Home&#8230; that&#8217;s something else. Not safe for work &#169;, .]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.likelihoodofconfusion.com/?feed=rss2&amp;p=6503</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>ABA Journal on Bloggers</title>
		<link>http://www.likelihoodofconfusion.com/?p=178&amp;utm_source=rss&amp;utm_medium=rss&amp;utm_campaign=aba-journal-on-bloggers</link>
		<comments>http://www.likelihoodofconfusion.com/?p=178#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 25 Aug 2010 03:43:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Ron Coleman</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Blogging]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[LIKELIHOOD OF CONFUSION®]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.likelihoodofconfusion.com/?p=178</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Originally posted 2005-07-15 14:09:49. Republished by Blog Post PromoterThe ABA Journal has an article on bloggers which mentions the Media Bloggers Association and quotes my own self. This is progress, I guess: Ten years ago I was writing for the ABA Journal, and now the ABA Journal&#8216;s writing about me! That doesn&#8217;t mean I&#8217;ll rejoin [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.likelihoodofconfusion.com/?feed=rss2&amp;p=178</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>&#8220;Infinity Dollars&#8221; &#8212; IP damages and the jury, Part 1</title>
		<link>http://www.likelihoodofconfusion.com/?p=2734&amp;utm_source=rss&amp;utm_medium=rss&amp;utm_campaign=infinity-dollars-ip-damages-and-the-jury-part-1</link>
		<comments>http://www.likelihoodofconfusion.com/?p=2734#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 25 Aug 2010 03:43:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Ron Coleman</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Copyright Law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Trademark Law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Damages]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Trials]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.likelihoodofconfusion.com/?p=2734</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Originally posted 2009-06-19 12:07:08. Republished by Blog Post PromoterA lot of people, including judges, lawyers and civilians, don&#8217;t seem to really understand what statutory damages are all about.  They are not supposed to be a windfall (discussed more here).  But just tell that to the jury that awarded &#8220;infinity dollars&#8221; &#8212; practically &#8212; to the [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.likelihoodofconfusion.com/?feed=rss2&amp;p=2734</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>6</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Impolitico, redux</title>
		<link>http://www.likelihoodofconfusion.com/?p=6492&amp;utm_source=rss&amp;utm_medium=rss&amp;utm_campaign=impolitico-redux</link>
		<comments>http://www.likelihoodofconfusion.com/?p=6492#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 25 Aug 2010 03:43:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Ron Coleman</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Blogging]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Trademark Law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[College Politico]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Distinctiveness]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politico]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Secondary Meaning]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.likelihoodofconfusion.com/?p=6492</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I first read about the brouhaha over the Politico trademark claim against the College Politico blog on Instapundit: ED MORRISSEY: “Who owns the word ‘Politico’?” The blogosphere has been very good to Politico, and I think they should bear in mind the ill-will they’re incurring as a result of their heavy-handed legal tactics. This is [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.likelihoodofconfusion.com/?feed=rss2&amp;p=6492</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>4</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Insta-Greetings</title>
		<link>http://www.likelihoodofconfusion.com/?p=4620&amp;utm_source=rss&amp;utm_medium=rss&amp;utm_campaign=insta-greetings-2</link>
		<comments>http://www.likelihoodofconfusion.com/?p=4620#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 17 Aug 2010 22:21:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Ron Coleman</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[LIKELIHOOD OF CONFUSION®]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.likelihoodofconfusion.com/?p=4620</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Originally posted 2005-01-05 20:48:00. Republished by Blog Post PromoterIf you&#8217;ve got a modem, you might get a link: It doesn&#8217;t get any better for a blogger on his third day in business. Now I feel a little guilty, though. It will pass. Thanks. Insta-Greetings &#169;, .]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.likelihoodofconfusion.com/?feed=rss2&amp;p=4620</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Getting a grip</title>
		<link>http://www.likelihoodofconfusion.com/?p=513&amp;utm_source=rss&amp;utm_medium=rss&amp;utm_campaign=getting-a-grip</link>
		<comments>http://www.likelihoodofconfusion.com/?p=513#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 17 Aug 2010 22:21:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Ron Coleman</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Everything else]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Humor]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.likelihoodofconfusion.com/?p=513</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Originally posted 2006-07-05 18:45:34. Republished by Blog Post PromoterI complain a lot in this space about the ruthless expansion of IP &#8220;rent seeking,&#8221; i.e., the attempt to snag &#8220;rights&#8221; wherever possible in &#8220;space&#8221; previously considered free and open for the imagination and for cultural interaction, you know? But looking back on this article from 1998, [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.likelihoodofconfusion.com/?feed=rss2&amp;p=513</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Trademarks mean something different up there, I guess</title>
		<link>http://www.likelihoodofconfusion.com/?p=768&amp;utm_source=rss&amp;utm_medium=rss&amp;utm_campaign=trademarks-mean-something-different-up-there-i-guess</link>
		<comments>http://www.likelihoodofconfusion.com/?p=768#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 17 Aug 2010 22:21:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Ron Coleman</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Trademark Law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Edifice Complexes]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.likelihoodofconfusion.com/?p=768</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Originally posted 2007-01-29 17:00:27. Republished by Blog Post PromoterCan a building be a trademark? Can a photo of a building be a trademark? Can a drawing based on a photo of a building be a trademark? I&#8217;d be inclined to answer no, no, maybe. Well, when the Supreme Court of your local country says it [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.likelihoodofconfusion.com/?feed=rss2&amp;p=768</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>3</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Knockoffs &#8212; nu?</title>
		<link>http://www.likelihoodofconfusion.com/?p=505&amp;utm_source=rss&amp;utm_medium=rss&amp;utm_campaign=knockoffs-nu</link>
		<comments>http://www.likelihoodofconfusion.com/?p=505#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 17 Aug 2010 22:21:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Ron Coleman</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Counterfeiting]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Roundups]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Counterfeit Chic]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.likelihoodofconfusion.com/?p=505</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Originally posted 2006-06-26 22:34:43. Republished by Blog Post PromoterYou&#8217;ve got to pay your dues if you want to sing the blues Websites with fake junk: too-good-to-be-trues! So many fakes out there &#8212; if you want honest schmooze, Click Counterfeit Chic for this week&#8217;s &#8220;Knockoff News&#8220;! Knockoffs &#8212; nu? &#169;, .]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.likelihoodofconfusion.com/?feed=rss2&amp;p=505</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Pick your poison</title>
		<link>http://www.likelihoodofconfusion.com/?p=6460&amp;utm_source=rss&amp;utm_medium=rss&amp;utm_campaign=pick-your-poison</link>
		<comments>http://www.likelihoodofconfusion.com/?p=6460#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 17 Aug 2010 22:21:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Ron Coleman</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Brand Management and Branding]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Trademark Law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Civil Procedure]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Licensing]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.likelihoodofconfusion.com/?p=6460</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Is it infringement or a breach of contract?  Is it a license or an assignment?  Well, whatever it is, it&#8217;s a little complicated, and Pamela Chestek does a good job of following all that geometry on her Property, Intangible blog. Not just a good job:  That blog post represents hard work &#8212; not just intellectually [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.likelihoodofconfusion.com/?feed=rss2&amp;p=6460</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Speaking of prior restraint!</title>
		<link>http://www.likelihoodofconfusion.com/?p=1416&amp;utm_source=rss&amp;utm_medium=rss&amp;utm_campaign=speaking-of-prior-restraint</link>
		<comments>http://www.likelihoodofconfusion.com/?p=1416#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 15 Aug 2010 21:50:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Ron Coleman</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Free Expression]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Censorship]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Duke University]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Journalism]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.likelihoodofconfusion.com/?p=1416</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Originally posted 2008-03-02 00:42:46. Republished by Blog Post PromoterWe toyed a little bit with the very big idea of prior restraint in constitutional law about a week ago. Now Clarice Feldman writes about &#8220;Duke&#8217;s boundless chutzpah&#8221;: After tarring and feathering and discriminating against the Duke lacrosse members at a critical juncture in their college careers [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.likelihoodofconfusion.com/?feed=rss2&amp;p=1416</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>There must be some kind of way out of here</title>
		<link>http://www.likelihoodofconfusion.com/?p=1555&amp;utm_source=rss&amp;utm_medium=rss&amp;utm_campaign=there-must-be-some-kind-of-way-out-of-here</link>
		<comments>http://www.likelihoodofconfusion.com/?p=1555#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 15 Aug 2010 21:50:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Ron Coleman</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Trademark Law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Celebrities]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Dead Celebs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Jimi Hendrix]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Right of Publicity]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.likelihoodofconfusion.com/?p=1555</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Originally posted 2008-07-09 00:51:24. Republished by Blog Post PromoterBut mediation isn&#8217;t it &#8212; in the Jimi Hendrix vodka case, that is, which Mike Atkins has been all over since last year, as we reported back then. No settlement, says Mike now; back on a litigation track. The hour&#8217;s getting late! UPDATE:  From Mike Atkins: The [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.likelihoodofconfusion.com/?feed=rss2&amp;p=1555</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>True twit</title>
		<link>http://www.likelihoodofconfusion.com/?p=3613&amp;utm_source=rss&amp;utm_medium=rss&amp;utm_campaign=true-twit</link>
		<comments>http://www.likelihoodofconfusion.com/?p=3613#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 15 Aug 2010 21:50:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Ron Coleman</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Roundups]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Social Networking]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tweets]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.likelihoodofconfusion.com/?p=3613</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Originally posted 2009-10-26 23:59:19. Republished by Blog Post Promoter[From October 26, 2009:] Here are last week&#8217;s greatest twits from @roncoleman: RT @ptolawyer: Subway sues Vegas restaurant for TM infringement -TacticalIP.com IP Bully of the Month? http://bit.ly/3c2lNO RT @nowsourcing: RT @toprank The Truth About SEO http://retwt.me/180kb RT @VBalasubramani: AutoAdmit web defame case settled http://bit.ly/1DX5kp (@bnatechlaw) case &#8211;&#62; issues re [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.likelihoodofconfusion.com/?feed=rss2&amp;p=3613</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>&#8220;Infringement Eater&#8221; off to Azkaban</title>
		<link>http://www.likelihoodofconfusion.com/?p=1126&amp;utm_source=rss&amp;utm_medium=rss&amp;utm_campaign=infringement-eater-off-to-azkaban</link>
		<comments>http://www.likelihoodofconfusion.com/?p=1126#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 15 Aug 2010 21:50:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Ron Coleman</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[LIKELIHOOD OF CONFUSION®]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.likelihoodofconfusion.com/?p=1126</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Originally posted 2007-08-08 14:04:05. Republished by Blog Post PromoterBut, of course! Reuters: Police have arrested a high school student suspected of posting his own translation of the latest Harry Potter book on the Internet weeks ahead of the official French release date, a newspaper reported on Wednesday. An irresistible form of piracy. Indeed, authenticity is [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.likelihoodofconfusion.com/?feed=rss2&amp;p=1126</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Goodbye, dolly</title>
		<link>http://www.likelihoodofconfusion.com/?p=1877&amp;utm_source=rss&amp;utm_medium=rss&amp;utm_campaign=goodbye-dolly</link>
		<comments>http://www.likelihoodofconfusion.com/?p=1877#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 15 Aug 2010 21:50:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Ron Coleman</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Copyright Law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Damages]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Fashion IP]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Trials]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.likelihoodofconfusion.com/?p=1877</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Originally posted 2009-01-17 23:52:25. Republished by Blog Post PromoterPamela Chestek reports on the dizzying fallout of the Bratz litigation. Goodbye, dolly &#169;, .]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.likelihoodofconfusion.com/?feed=rss2&amp;p=1877</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Not Baidu enough</title>
		<link>http://www.likelihoodofconfusion.com/?p=6436&amp;utm_source=rss&amp;utm_medium=rss&amp;utm_campaign=not-baidu-enough</link>
		<comments>http://www.likelihoodofconfusion.com/?p=6436#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 15 Aug 2010 21:50:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Jane Coleman</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Trademark Law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Baidu v. Register]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Contributory Infringement]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Secondary Trademark Liability]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.likelihoodofconfusion.com/?p=6436</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Baidu is another case in which the court declined to extend anything like a strict-liability standard for contributory infringement, in this case against a domain registrar.  In Baidu, the court considered allegations that the domain name registrar had allegedly been “tricked” by the alleged direct infringer into divulging security information about its customer, the Chinese [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.likelihoodofconfusion.com/?feed=rss2&amp;p=6436</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Oklahama! OK!</title>
		<link>http://www.likelihoodofconfusion.com/?p=4670&amp;utm_source=rss&amp;utm_medium=rss&amp;utm_campaign=oklahama-ok-2</link>
		<comments>http://www.likelihoodofconfusion.com/?p=4670#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 11 Aug 2010 15:48:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Ron Coleman</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[LIKELIHOOD OF CONFUSION®]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.likelihoodofconfusion.com/?p=4670</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Originally posted 2005-02-24 18:18:00. Republished by Blog Post PromoterIs it still &#8220;mainstream media&#8221; if the guy isn&#8217;t wearing a tie? Oklahama! OK! &#169;, .]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.likelihoodofconfusion.com/?feed=rss2&amp;p=4670</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Publishers vs. YouTube</title>
		<link>http://www.likelihoodofconfusion.com/?p=542&amp;utm_source=rss&amp;utm_medium=rss&amp;utm_campaign=publishers-vs-youtube</link>
		<comments>http://www.likelihoodofconfusion.com/?p=542#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 11 Aug 2010 15:48:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Ron Coleman</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Copyright Law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Fair Use]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.likelihoodofconfusion.com/?p=542</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Originally posted 2006-07-30 11:16:39. Republished by Blog Post Promoter Mack Reed puts his finger on it &#8212; almost &#8212; in the Online Journalism Review: The Web has made unauthorized propagation of information &#8212; whether copyrighted or not &#8212; instantaneous and virtually irreversible. Videos are uploaded, downloaded and re-uploaded under different authors&#8217; names: YouTube users know [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.likelihoodofconfusion.com/?feed=rss2&amp;p=542</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Dough, a dear</title>
		<link>http://www.likelihoodofconfusion.com/?p=6408&amp;utm_source=rss&amp;utm_medium=rss&amp;utm_campaign=pillsbury-doughboy-takes-on-dough-girl-in-trademark-infringement-case-abc-news</link>
		<comments>http://www.likelihoodofconfusion.com/?p=6408#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 11 Aug 2010 15:48:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Ron Coleman</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Brand Management and Branding]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Trademark Law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Dilution]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Distinctiveness]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Likelihood of confusion]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[My Dough Girl]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Pillsbury Dough Boy]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.likelihoodofconfusion.com/?p=6408</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The Stay-Puft Marshmallow Man wreaked some havoc in his time, but who would have thought that his inspiration &#8212; the Pillsbury Doughboy &#8212; would act the part of a veritable Gozer the Destroyer himself, at the expense of a funky new-age bakery? A few weeks ago, the founder of a Salt Lake City-based bakery, My Dough [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.likelihoodofconfusion.com/?feed=rss2&amp;p=6408</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
