Comments on: Designer Skin v. S&L continued: “S&L had a perfect right to sell this product” http://www.likelihoodofconfusion.com/?p=1567&utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=designer-skin-continued-had-perfect-right-sell-this-product Blog on trademark, copyright, Internet law and free speech Tue, 07 Sep 2010 23:27:05 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.1 By: LIKELIHOOD OF CONFUSION® » Blog Archive » eBay, Vero and the Scientologists http://www.likelihoodofconfusion.com/?p=1567&cpage=1#comment-278804 LIKELIHOOD OF CONFUSION® » Blog Archive » eBay, Vero and the Scientologists Thu, 11 Dec 2008 03:27:50 +0000 http://www.likelihoodofconfusion.com/?p=1567#comment-278804 [...] tanning goop manufacturers Australian Gold and Designer Skin, Scientology wants to control distribution of its merchandise; like those companies as well, it is [...] [...] tanning goop manufacturers Australian Gold and Designer Skin, Scientology wants to control distribution of its merchandise; like those companies as well, it is [...]

]]> By: LIKELIHOOD OF CONFUSION® » Blog Archive » Beyond fair use http://www.likelihoodofconfusion.com/?p=1567&cpage=1#comment-273423 LIKELIHOOD OF CONFUSION® » Blog Archive » Beyond fair use Mon, 24 Nov 2008 05:12:41 +0000 http://www.likelihoodofconfusion.com/?p=1567#comment-273423 [...] Well, of course. [...] [...] Well, of course. [...]

]]> By: LIKELIHOOD OF CONFUSION® » Blog Archive » Fool’s gold http://www.likelihoodofconfusion.com/?p=1567&cpage=1#comment-269797 LIKELIHOOD OF CONFUSION® » Blog Archive » Fool’s gold Sun, 16 Nov 2008 18:33:08 +0000 http://www.likelihoodofconfusion.com/?p=1567#comment-269797 [...] been allowed, nothing. Lucky for us, as regular readers know, the ruled that there would be no damages in the case at all (this and other great rulings have been appealed by the [...] [...] been allowed, nothing. Lucky for us, as regular readers know, the ruled that there would be no damages in the case at all (this and other great rulings have been appealed by the [...]

]]> By: LIKELIHOOD OF CONFUSION® » Blog Archive » Football Redskins live to fight another day http://www.likelihoodofconfusion.com/?p=1567&cpage=1#comment-234571 LIKELIHOOD OF CONFUSION® » Blog Archive » Football Redskins live to fight another day Wed, 03 Sep 2008 14:59:27 +0000 http://www.likelihoodofconfusion.com/?p=1567#comment-234571 [...] terms that reach this blog.  The latest, which we missed when it came out in July and we were otherwise engaged, is that the NFL’s Washington Redskins again prevailed in a lawsuit brought by a group of [...] [...] terms that reach this blog.  The latest, which we missed when it came out in July and we were otherwise engaged, is that the NFL’s Washington Redskins again prevailed in a lawsuit brought by a group of [...]

]]> By: LIKELIHOOD OF CONFUSION® » Blog Archive » Even the MSM has to worry about free speech sometimes! http://www.likelihoodofconfusion.com/?p=1567&cpage=1#comment-230779 LIKELIHOOD OF CONFUSION® » Blog Archive » Even the MSM has to worry about free speech sometimes! Wed, 27 Aug 2008 23:12:19 +0000 http://www.likelihoodofconfusion.com/?p=1567#comment-230779 [...] the other side of it, hiding behind some pretextual body of law or another. (And perhaps solely a suntan lotion issue!)  But it’s not: DENVER–Police in Denver arrested an ABC News producer today as [...] [...] the other side of it, hiding behind some pretextual body of law or another. (And perhaps solely a suntan lotion issue!)  But it’s not: DENVER–Police in Denver arrested an ABC News producer today as [...]

]]> By: Whisper | Blawg Review #169 http://www.likelihoodofconfusion.com/?p=1567&cpage=1#comment-207915 Whisper | Blawg Review #169 Mon, 21 Jul 2008 16:33:54 +0000 http://www.likelihoodofconfusion.com/?p=1567#comment-207915 [...] IP maven Ron Coleman blogs about a case in which he successfully represented a client. [...] [...] IP maven Ron Coleman blogs about a case in which he successfully represented a client. [...]

]]> By: Ron Coleman http://www.likelihoodofconfusion.com/?p=1567&cpage=1#comment-207913 Ron Coleman Mon, 21 Jul 2008 16:24:42 +0000 http://www.likelihoodofconfusion.com/?p=1567#comment-207913 I wish "intellectual" property were as all-encompassing in that sense as "brand equity" types claim to believe it is in their own far less meritorious senses, Jaded! I wish “intellectual” property were as all-encompassing in that sense as “brand equity” types claim to believe it is in their own far less meritorious senses, Jaded!

]]> By: Jaded Topaz http://www.likelihoodofconfusion.com/?p=1567&cpage=1#comment-207559 Jaded Topaz Mon, 21 Jul 2008 00:52:57 +0000 http://www.likelihoodofconfusion.com/?p=1567#comment-207559 Well I'm listed as the current owner of the multi faceted creative life rendering of said self/soul/brain in real life. As the unique artist of my brain and life, I've worked hard for years combining the elements and energies / branding/cultivating intellectualism/incorporating all kinds of coloring. Creating the personal image/emotions and outlooks from pure personal experience and scratch down to the jewelry/natural suntan and jaded outlooks. I believe by registering this creative life, brain, soul and self in a timely fashion, I can be assured the opportunity of a lifetime, the ability to sue any individual that I feel is infringing on my sense of self,thinking or soul. Or just plain using me. Its that simple really ;-) Well I’m listed as the current owner of the multi faceted creative life rendering of said self/soul/brain in real life.
As the unique artist of my brain and life, I’ve worked hard for years combining the elements and energies / branding/cultivating intellectualism/incorporating all kinds of coloring.
Creating the personal image/emotions and outlooks from pure personal experience and scratch down to the jewelry/natural suntan and jaded outlooks.
I believe by registering this creative life, brain, soul and self in a timely fashion, I can be assured the opportunity of a lifetime, the ability to sue any individual that I feel is infringing on my sense of self,thinking or soul.
Or just plain using me. Its that simple really ;-)

]]> By: Jaded Topaz http://www.likelihoodofconfusion.com/?p=1567&cpage=1#comment-207395 Jaded Topaz Sun, 20 Jul 2008 18:31:40 +0000 http://www.likelihoodofconfusion.com/?p=1567#comment-207395 Quite the mesmerizing mix of sentences / sentiments and conclusions on this copyright infringement & false association claims piece. Litigation these days can sometimes read like hardcore art for the intellectually inclined. I never really knew just how versatile and both ways, the copyright act could swing, depending on the angle needed. I guess it’s all about protection in life. And it’s never too late! Which brings me to my next question, if I register my copyrighted soul or brain as an in depth, abstract, creative rendering, can I sue anyone that uses my soul or brain, (creative works I’ve been working on for years), for their own good and profits ? What kind of specimen would I need to register my brain and or soul at the copyright office? If I registered my body would everything be included ? <em>Jaded, are you the creator of the unique self? And is that creation truly... reduced to "tangible" form? I hardly think so! -- RDC</em> Quite the mesmerizing mix of sentences / sentiments and conclusions on this copyright infringement & false association claims piece. Litigation these days can sometimes read like hardcore art for the intellectually inclined.

I never really knew just how versatile and both ways, the copyright act could swing, depending on the angle needed. I guess it’s all about protection in life. And it’s never too late!

Which brings me to my next question, if I register my copyrighted soul or brain as an in depth, abstract, creative rendering, can I sue anyone that uses my soul or brain, (creative works I’ve been working on for years), for their own good and profits ?

What kind of specimen would I need to register my brain and or soul at the copyright office?
If I registered my body would everything be included ?

Jaded, are you the creator of the unique self? And is that creation truly… reduced to “tangible” form? I hardly think so! — RDC

]]>