<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Social networking your way to summary judgment</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.likelihoodofconfusion.com/?feed=rss2&#038;p=1709" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.likelihoodofconfusion.com/?p=1709&amp;utm_source=rss&amp;utm_medium=rss&amp;utm_campaign=social-networking-your-way-to-summary-judgment</link>
	<description>Blog on trademark, copyright, Internet law and free speech</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Sep 2010 00:56:11 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Blawg Review # 186 &#124; Res Ipsa Blog</title>
		<link>http://www.likelihoodofconfusion.com/?p=1709&#038;cpage=1#comment-270256</link>
		<dc:creator>Blawg Review # 186 &#124; Res Ipsa Blog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 17 Nov 2008 11:04:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.likelihoodofconfusion.com/?p=1709#comment-270256</guid>
		<description>[...] Daniel Schwartz at the Connecticut Employment Law Blog takes a look at whether social networking sites should be off-limits to discovery in discrimination suits. Ron Coleman at Likelihood of Confusion discusses the expectations of privacy for content uploaded to personal or social networking websites. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Daniel Schwartz at the Connecticut Employment Law Blog takes a look at whether social networking sites should be off-limits to discovery in discrimination suits. Ron Coleman at Likelihood of Confusion discusses the expectations of privacy for content uploaded to personal or social networking websites. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Nowhere to hide</title>
		<link>http://www.likelihoodofconfusion.com/?p=1709&#038;cpage=1#comment-269673</link>
		<dc:creator>Nowhere to hide</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 16 Nov 2008 12:01:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.likelihoodofconfusion.com/?p=1709#comment-269673</guid>
		<description>[...] When your litigation opponent subpoenas your Facebook, Amazon, MySpace, Flickr, LinkedIn and (locked) Twitter pages (&amp; Likelihood of Confusion). [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] When your litigation opponent subpoenas your Facebook, Amazon, MySpace, Flickr, LinkedIn and (locked) Twitter pages (&#38; Likelihood of Confusion). [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Supremacy Claus</title>
		<link>http://www.likelihoodofconfusion.com/?p=1709&#038;cpage=1#comment-269583</link>
		<dc:creator>Supremacy Claus</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 16 Nov 2008 09:03:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.likelihoodofconfusion.com/?p=1709#comment-269583</guid>
		<description>1) One should argue that anonymous or pseudonymous postings are those of a fictional character. Ian Fleming should not be put on trial for the extra-judicial executions of James Bond.

2) There should develop a lawyer standard of due care to subpoena the total postings of the opposing lawyer, searching for improper motive. After the first adverse ruling, seek the total postings of the judge, looking for bias. 

3) The total postings of any government lawyer and of all superiors in the agency, harassing the innocent citizen with government gotcha on bogus government regulation should be demanded and subpoenaed. 

Under no circumstances should the innocent client be left alone to dwell in uncertainty.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>1) One should argue that anonymous or pseudonymous postings are those of a fictional character. Ian Fleming should not be put on trial for the extra-judicial executions of James Bond.</p>
<p>2) There should develop a lawyer standard of due care to subpoena the total postings of the opposing lawyer, searching for improper motive. After the first adverse ruling, seek the total postings of the judge, looking for bias. </p>
<p>3) The total postings of any government lawyer and of all superiors in the agency, harassing the innocent citizen with government gotcha on bogus government regulation should be demanded and subpoenaed. </p>
<p>Under no circumstances should the innocent client be left alone to dwell in uncertainty.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
