http://www.likelihoodofconfusion.com/?p=2805&utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=he-just-bought-it-like-that Blog on trademark, copyright, Internet law and free speech Tue, 07 Sep 2010 23:27:05 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.1 http://www.likelihoodofconfusion.com/?p=2805&cpage=1#comment-346359 Ron Coleman Fri, 03 Jul 2009 11:07:47 +0000 http://www.likelihoodofconfusion.com/?p=2805#comment-346359 OK, rub it in, John. Why stop at putting this comment into two posts? Why not 20? Now I know why you didn't permit comments until like last week. OK, rub it in, John. Why stop at putting this comment into two posts? Why not 20? Now I know why you didn’t permit comments until like last week.

]]> http://www.likelihoodofconfusion.com/?p=2805&cpage=1#comment-346347 John L. Welch Fri, 03 Jul 2009 08:17:36 +0000 http://www.likelihoodofconfusion.com/?p=2805#comment-346347 The quotation from Publisher's Weekly seems to concern the temporary restraining order, not the preliminary injunction decision. Judge Batts did rule on the fair use defense and rejected it in granting the preliminary injunction. The quotation from Publisher’s Weekly seems to concern the temporary restraining order, not the preliminary injunction decision. Judge Batts did rule on the fair use defense and rejected it in granting the preliminary injunction.

]]>