The other side of anonymity
February 24th, 2009 by Ron Coleman | Print
What happens when it’s the plaintiff that is anonymous, and wants to stay that way?
-
The question of LIKELIHOOD OF CONFUSION is the signal test to determine if a trademark infringement claim is valid. This blog is about trademark law, copyright law, free speech (mostly as it relates to the Internet) and legal issues related to blogging.
As for me, I'm Ron Coleman, a trademark lawyer in New York. More precisely, I'm a commercial litigator, business attorney and "IP maven" with a special interest in copyright and trademark infringement involving the Internet--including advising clients how to avoid them. I am also a writer and notional general counsel of the largely notional Media Bloggers Association. My firm, Goetz Fitzpatrick LLP, has offices in New York and New Jersey. I'm also a contributor to a few other blogs, including Dean's World.After you read the disclaimer below, you may click here to email me.
LIKELIHOOD OF CONFUSION® is a registered trademark for blogs, and it's mine.
And here's my privacy policy, while we're at it.
-
-
@roncoleman Twitter Feed
- Ok so I water my lawn in wingtips. You got a problem with that? http://myloc.me/boaP1
- RT @copycense: Need Righthaven representation? Contact Eva Galperin at eva (at) eff (dot) org” /via @clarinette02 @citmedialaw”
- RT @walterolson: "Bad idea of the day: copyrighting cocktails" [@felixreuters] http://is.gd/eRmRP | So much, so wrong....
- RT @walterolson: "15 new legal blogs prove the blawgosphere is alive and kicking" [Ambrogi, LTN] | Non-sequitur http://myloc.me/bn1P8
- Lost in translation? Rosetta Stone v. Google http://bit.ly/bg8RlX | LIKELIHOOD OF CONFUSION® (secondary #TM infr. http://bit.ly/O09pr)
-
9 Responses to “The other side of anonymity”
Leave a Reply
February 24th, 2009 at 3:14 pm
LIKELY / CONFUSION The other side of anonymity: What happens when it’s the plaintiff tha.. http://tinyurl.com/asstr2
February 24th, 2009 at 7:14 pm
I’ll take “What is unconstitutional for $600, Alex.”
February 24th, 2009 at 8:46 pm
Anonymity is permissible for Plaintiffs in very limited circumstances.
February 25th, 2009 at 3:04 am
The other side of anonymity http://tinyurl.com/asstr2
February 25th, 2009 at 4:38 pm
How is one ever supposed to prove defamation without actually revealing who they are or directly citing the specific defamatory material (which presumably does reveal who they are)?
February 25th, 2009 at 5:25 pm
I am assuming they do so by utilizing sealed pleadings and a non-public trial, which of course is extraordinary to say the least.
February 25th, 2009 at 7:36 pm
Ron Coleman: “What happens when it’s the plaintiff that is anonymous, and wants to stay that way?” http://bit.ly/EYO6D
February 25th, 2009 at 8:47 pm
Roe v. Wade
February 26th, 2009 at 12:06 am
[...] Defamation suits: “What happens when it’s the plaintiff that is anonymous, and wants to stay that way?” [Ron Coleman] [...]