Cobranding hell — New York, 42nd Street at Third Avenue

Cobranding hell
Is it a coffee shop with armed guards? A decaffeinated bank?

In fact it’s a bank next to a coffee shop, and they seem to share an entrance (though not hours).  The windows alternate the trademarks of North Fork Bank and Starbucks, one of about six Starbucks shops in a three-square-block radius.

Is this a cure for trademark over-saturation? An attempt to make North Fork Bank seem funky, artsy, thoughtful?

Or is it just a coffee shop next to a bank?



Author:Ron Coleman

I write this blog.

4 Responses to “Cobranding hell — New York, 42nd Street at Third Avenue”

  1. Karla
    November 26, 2007 at 11:42 am #

    Yeah, alternating the trademarks does not make sense for me. Maybe they thought this was the only way to make the customers know that they’re sharing a door. However, an additional sign directing customers should be enough…


  1. Benefits of Co-branding | Logo Design Works - December 3, 2007

    […] By the way, Likelihood of Confusion blog has a good example of a co-branding hell. Like this article? Subscribe to our RSS feed Add to | Digg This! | Technorati | Blinklist | Furl | reddit […]

  2. LIKELIHOOD OF CONFUSION® » Blog Archive » Dimming star? - January 31, 2008

    […] Ouch.  (Via Instapundit.)  Ann sees it happening in the automated coffee machines in the shops.  But could it have to do with branding incoherence typified by this? […]

  3. LIKELIHOOD OF CONFUSION® » Blog Archive » Another black eye for Starbucks - September 22, 2008

    […] respect in Korea…  embarrassed in Africa… cross-branding eye-crossing in Manhattan… compromising in Arabia… and now […]