DomainIncite PRO is excited to reveal the results of the domain name industryâ€™s first in-depth study into how the worldâ€™s biggest brands use new generic top-level domains.
In March and April 2012, we surveyed the domain name ownership and usage patterns of the worldâ€™s 100 most-valuable brands â€” representing over $1.2 trillion in brand value, according to Interbrand â€” in six gTLDs introduced since 2001.
As well as confirming the long-held belief that brand owners see little value in defensive registrations â€” many not even choosing to benefit from residual traffic â€” the survey also revealed which brands are more likely to develop their sites, which are most vulnerable to cybersquatting, and which appear to care the least about enforcing their brands.
We also examined how â€œcybersquattersâ€ use the domain names they register, with some surprising results.
Privacy/proxy registration is not nearly as prevalent as many believe, our study found, and a significant portion of registrants have made no effort to monetize the domains they own that match famous brand names.
I wish I had time to get on top of this stuff. Just from the teaser, however, I’m perceiving one thing that I had predicted is, kind of, coming to pass: Domain names are, in fact, becoming passÃ©.
I don’t assume Kevin puts it that way in his report. After all, he’s got this domaining blog; it’s like his life’s work, and that of many others; and just ask my friend Paul Keating — there’s plenty going in UDRP-land, governed as it is by a non-law interpreted by non-courts (not like our oh-so-with-it real courts!). Even I play the domain game from time to time.
But reading between the lines of the above, it seems that domain names are of some relevance, yes, but mainly as a part of a far more complex formula that determines how people get places on the Internet and what they “get” once they get there.