Comments from another blog; or, Did I get chocolate in Marty’s peanut butter?

Originally posted 2009-03-24 15:47:16. Republished by Blog Post Promoter

Via Marty Schwimmer’s Trademark Blog:

http://www.schwimmerlegal.com/2009/03/reeses_pieces_v.htmlMarty, you got peanut butter in my chocolate! You’re considering the respective design and layout choices in isolation, seriatim, rather than looking at the whole and acknowledging, hey, peanut butter cups!

Having said that: I acknowledge that this is a borderline case. It may very well be properly described as allusive of the TM in question… but I’ve argued on some blog or another that I don’t endorse the idea that every allusion to a cultural icon is a trademark infringement, or even a dilution.

But if you buy into the philosophy of dilution at all, and hey, it’s the law, this may meet the new and devolved “likelihood of dilution” test. I just can’t conceive what could be motivating this defendant to litigate.

powerbarFrankly Reese’s has a bit of problem in that it has probably established such a strong “look” in the peanut butter category that peanut-butter based balanceconvenience food products are routinely sold utilizing the not-all-that-intuitive orange color in one way or another. It’s a little bit like the Hellmans’ Mayonnaise “official mayonnaise colors” stingerproblem, too…

Well, that’s a digression. But, you know — Reese’s, cursive, orange, brown, disk shapes — I’d sign that complaint for money.

Originally posted as a comment by Ron Coleman on The Trademark Blog using Disqus.

email

Tags: , , , ,

Author:Ron Coleman

I write this blog.

No comments yet.

Leave a Reply