Fair use is for “E”veryone

Originally posted 2007-02-06 16:43:19. Republished by Blog Post Promoter

The IP Rights and Games blog gets my attention with a little proprietary link-and-wink (are we becoming the “brand” for LIKELIHOOD OF CONFUSION?! I sure hope so) in an interesting and well done analysis of, guess what, trademark overreaching:

Uber gaming blogger Kotaku got some interesting flak for the Entertainment SoftwareMom Rated E Association (ESA), the organization that gives ratings to video games. Kotaku had a posting about a guy selling t-shirts that said: “Your Mom – Rated “E” for Everyone”. The phrase “Rated E for Everyone” is what the ESA uses for its rating / tagline regarding “kids games” like Cars or SpongeBob Squarepants.

The ESA is posturing that the post is an advertisement, and that the posting will create consumer confusion, and “a substantial likelihood that the ESRB certification marks will face tarnishment and dilution.” that has commercial purposes and tarnishes their mark.

I agree with the IP Rights and Games Special Interest Group: The t-shirt itself is probably not really a parody; it’s just going for a ride on the good will built by the ESA. But the blog reporting about it? That’s editorial comment, fair use in its purest form. “E” is for execrable, too, ESA.  And excess. (And ethically questionable.) Give it up.

email

Tags: , ,

Author:Ron Coleman

I write this blog.

Subscribe

There are all kinds of social media formats to subscribe or otherwise follow the adventures of LIKELIHOOD OF CONFUSION®. Or see the posts-by-email option below.

Trackbacks/Pingbacks

  1. LIKELIHOOD OF CONFUSION » Blog Archive » Rated R for infRingement - April 19, 2007

    [...] John Welch reports that the TTAB has ruled that “RATED R SPORTSWEAR” is confusingly similar to the famous “RATED R” movie certification mark. We wrote about another “ratings logo” lawsuit a while ago. [...]

Leave a Reply