Originally posted 2009-01-17 23:52:25. Republished by Blog Post Promoter
The question of whether consumers are likely to be confused is the signal inquiry that determines if a trademark infringement claim is valid. This blog is about trademark law, copyright law, free speech (mostly as it relates to the Internet) and legal issues related to blogging.
As for me, I'm Ron Coleman, a commercial litigator, business attorney and, some say, "IP maven" with a special interest in copyright and trademark infringement involving the Internet--including advising clients how to avoid them. I am also a writer and general counsel of the notional Media Bloggers Association.
For more information, or to learn more about retaining my services, please click here.
LIKELIHOOD OF CONFUSION® is a registered trademark for blogs, and it's mine. And this is my very special privacy policy.
Follow @likely2confuse on Twitter
I’m high-ranked and I know it.
Is LIKELIHOOD OF CONFUSION® really all that? Rankings-wise? Is it really one of the top law blogs in the galaxy?
It is, for what that's worth.
As of right now, here are the latest rankings via:
- All legal blogs on Avvo.com
- Most popular law blogs this month on Justia (sometimes)
- All IP law blogs, by popularity, on Justia
- All copyright law blogs, by popularity on Justia (whoa!)
- Alltop's law blogs and
- Cision.com's Top 50 Law Blogs
Then there's this kind of odd thing.
It's easy it is to game almost any ranking system, not that I've tried to. As such. These are just what they are.
Follow @roncoleman on Twitter
DISCLAIMER
THIS BLOG IS ONLY A BLOG, NOT LEGAL ADVICE. IT IS IN PART AN ADVERTISEMENT FOR LEGAL SERVICES BY ME, LAWYER RONALD D. COLEMAN, BUT I AM NOT YOUR LAWYER. YOU ARE NOT MY CLIENT. JUST WALK BESIDE ME AND BE MY FRIEND.
The term of art maven is used to mean "wise guy" here and is not meant to suggest that I have certified or other "expertise" in any particular field of legal practice. But try me.
Justia – Top IP Blogs
- Guest Post: A rejoinder from the IPKatContinuing with our debate, between Darren Smyth of IPKat fame and Siva Thambisetty, on the merits of the Supreme Court's decision in the Novartis case, we have for our readers a rejoinder from Darren in response to Siva's last post on this issue.The two previous posts on this issue can be accessed over here and here. A Rejoinder from the IPKat, by […]Prashant Reddy
- Maker Faire 2013 - SaturdayPictures from the Saturday of the Faire. […]William Carleton
- Jury Award for Software Trade Secrets Theft Affirmed by Third CircuitWellogix sued Accenture (and other parties) for misappropriating trade secrets related to software that helped manage the process of constructing an oil well. A jury awarded $26.2 million in compensatory damages, and $68.2 million in punitive damages, the punitive award having subsequently been reduced to $18.2 million by a remittitur. On appeal, the Third C […]Charles Bieneman
- Copyright 2.0 Show – Episode 283 – Fair Use VacationCongress mulls DMCA reform, Aereo seeks summary judgment and Google opposes class action status in Authors Guild case. […]Jonathan Bailey
- Crowdfunding UpdateWe are still patiently waiting for the SEC to develop rules implementing the crowdfunding provisions of the JOBS Act. While we are waiting, the industry prepares for the crowdfunding transactions. Recently, two interesting articles about crowdfunding caught my attention. First, thecrowdcafe.com published an article regarding the status of different crowdfund […]Arina Shulga
- Dr. Phil Sues Gawker Media for Copyright InfringementAs briefly discussed above, Peteski brought this action against Deadspin because Deadspin copied the Dr. Phil show that had an exclusive interview with Ronaiah Tuiasosopo. Tuiasosopo is the brains (and voice) behind the hoax that was played on Notre Dame football player Manti Te'o. What was the hoax? A fake online girlfriend for the football player. On […]Adrienne Kendrick