Inducement to contribute to infringe … to roll on

Originally posted 2013-02-12 16:34:14. Republished by Blog Post Promoter

Michael Atkins:

Novel causes of action for contributory cybersquatting and contributory dilution appear to viable here in the Western District [of Washington].

On Jan. 12, Western District Judge Ricardo Martinez refused to dismiss such claims plaintiff brought in Microsoft Corp. v. Shah.

In that case, Microsoft alleges defendants, among other things, induced others to engage in cybersquatting and dilution by instructing them on how to use Microsoft trademarks to increase traffic on their Web sites. Microsoft also alleges defendants sold a product that contained software that enabled buyers to create Web sites incorporating Microsoft marks to help sell emoticon-related software, including a video narrated by defendant Amish Shah.

Defendants moved to dismiss, arguing claims for contributory cybersquatting and contributory dilution are not recognized.

The court denied the motion.

This is an interesting development, and one to watch, in light of what I see as the overall reluctance of courts to extend the law of secondary liability for trademark infringement — including with respect to domain name registrars.

email

Ron Coleman

I write this blog.

10 thoughts on “Inducement to contribute to infringe … to roll on

  1. “Amish Shah” causes me to have mental images of a leader of pre-revolutionary Iran who dresses in black and uses a horse and buggy instead of a car.

  2. Pingback: INTA
  3. Pingback: DebraTuomey
  4. Pingback: Patricia Williams
  5. Pingback: InternetLaw
  6. Pingback: Vere Software
  7. Pingback: Miquel Peguera
  8. Pingback: Javier de la Cueva
  9. Pingback: Ofelia Tejerina
  10. Pingback: Sergio Carrasco

Comments are closed.