Jus good enough?

Originally posted 2010-06-04 13:13:32. Republished by Blog Post Promoter

Property, intangible:

“Jus tertii” – Wikipedia says Latin for “third party rights” – is a claim by a defendant that someone else has rights superior to the plaintiff’s that defeat the plaintiff’s claim.It’s generally a loser in a trademark case, because a trademark plaintiff need not have exclusive rights. . . .

There is an exception to the usual disfavor for a jus tertii defense, which is if the defendant can prove privity with the third party allowing it to claim some entitlement to the priority rights of the third party:

[I]f a third party permits a defendant to use a trademark as part of a contractual arrangement, the defendant can avoid liability for trademark infringement by invoking the superior trademark rights of the third party.

Pamela Chestek, now I can stand when you enter the room:  You’ve taught me something utterly, completely new I never knew before.

And you, readers, never knew there was such a thing I could admit that there was such a thing, did you?!

email

Tags: , ,

Author:Ron Coleman

I write this blog.

Subscribe

There are all kinds of social media formats to subscribe or otherwise follow the adventures of LIKELIHOOD OF CONFUSION®. Or see the posts-by-email option below.

3 Responses to “Jus good enough?”

  1. June 4, 2010 at 11:25 pm #

    Shucks, you can sit down now -

Trackbacks/Pingbacks

  1. Lowell Steiger - June 6, 2010

    Jus good enough? (Trademark infringement) http://bit.ly/aYk0xY

  2. Lowell Steiger - June 6, 2010

    Jus good enough? (Trademark infringement) http://bit.ly/aYk0xY

Leave a Reply