Lookalike “house brands”

The 43(B)log discusses a recent Third Circuit opinion on this topic — one that people ask me about all the time.  Well, ask Rebecca Tushnet!  Her bottom line:

Essentially, the court of appeals thought that the district court had created a near-absolute “house brand” defense independent of the confusion factors, which was inappropriate. The court of appeals recognized that a prominent house brand might allow store brands to “‘get away’ with” a little more similarity than other defendants’ comparable products. But a tiny differentiating label won’t suffice in any event.

Hat tip to Marty Schwimmer.

email

Author:Ron Coleman

I write this blog.

Trackbacks/Pingbacks

  1. LIKELIHOOD OF CONFUSION® » Blog Archive » Bring out The Best? - June 6, 2008

    […] we blogged about a development in this area earlier this year, in which the Third Circuit Court of Appeals said, well, no, that kind of copying is not really […]