MLB, IP piggies, strike again

Originally posted 2008-03-31 12:10:00. Republished by Blog Post Promoter

Susan Scafidi writes about a guy who was stopped by Major League Baseball from selling “baseball shirts” that look like this (on the right):

Huh? Her take:

While typefaces themselves are not protected by copyright, their use is frequently an essential trademark element. MLB apparently claimed that Morris Levin’s deliberate invocation of the nation’s pastime, combined with his use of copycat lettering and color combinations, constituted trademark infringement. And, as the Smoking Gun noted, even Hillary’s official favorite teams — the Yankees and the Cubs — were Obamized.

I think this is bunk, mixed in with ju-u-u-u-u-ust enough truth. I had a very similar case, where my client’s shirts actually used the names of team cities along with the known team colors plus the style demonstrated above, but here “Obama,” not “Baltimore,” is what’s on the shirt. So I ask you: Does Major League Baseball own every color combination utilized by a major league team along with “baseball” lettering?

Preposterous. Now, in fact, if you look at the shirts over The Smoking Gun, which Susan links to, you’ll see that many of them go much further than the shirts shown above. So this, too, was one of those hard factual cases. Most judges won’t take the time to pick out the infringements from the non-infringements.

One day, however, MLB — increasingly my bête noire around here — will pick the wrong patsy. I hope that patsy finds my phone number.

email

Tags: , , ,

Author:Ron Coleman

I write this blog.

Subscribe

There are all kinds of social media formats to subscribe or otherwise follow the adventures of LIKELIHOOD OF CONFUSION®. Or see the posts-by-email option below.

5 Responses to “MLB, IP piggies, strike again”

  1. March 31, 2008 at 2:52 pm #

    You know, it seems like the fact that the Orioles, among others, also sell shwag in PINK should count against them somehow…

  2. Idol
    July 15, 2009 at 7:13 pm #

    To what extent does Major League Baseball stand on firm trademark grounds when it seeks to bar use of the three letter phrase MLB in any and every professional baseball related domain name in which it might appear as in http://www.MLBnews.com, http://www.MLBstuff.com, etc.? Does the nature of the domains use matter; as it’s use to provide baseball news vs. it’s use to sell licensed baseball collectibles?

    Thanks for your thoughts.

Trackbacks/Pingbacks

  1. Ron Coleman - September 4, 2009

    RT @MegLG: Copyright too far: MLB — no permission to describe game to friend http://ow.ly/nZ1u Yes, MLB is IP pig: http://bit.ly/13vcsR

  2. Rededication | LIKELIHOOD OF CONFUSION® - September 16, 2013

    […] Welch of the TTAB Blog reports that, in typical MLB piggy fashion, the New York Yankees say if they can take it there, they can take it […]

  3. Nothing but err: Jordan upsets Jewel Osco trademark D in OT | LIKELIHOOD OF CONFUSION® - February 21, 2014

    […] that’s just me, and after all, rent seeking is the one thing that’s consistently, if not always successfully, practiced at the highest level in every aspect of the sports business.  In practice, it seems […]

Leave a Reply