Originally posted 2007-12-17 17:46:21. Republished by Blog Post Promoter
The TTABlog designates as “Recommended Reading” Scot Duvall on the The Trademark Dilution Revision Act of 2006. From John’s description, he makes the Act all kinds of “balanced” and stuff. Maybe I’ve been too harsh.
No related posts.
The question of whether consumers are likely to be confused is the signal inquiry that determines if a trademark infringement claim is valid. This blog is about trademark law, copyright law, free speech (mostly as it relates to the Internet) and legal issues related to blogging.
As for me, I'm a partner and commercial litigator at Goetz Fitzpatrick LLP with offices in New York and New Jersey (but active nationwide) and, some say, "IP maven"* with a special interest in copyright and trademark infringement involving the Internet--including advising clients how to avoid them.
For more information, or to learn more about retaining me, please click here.
LIKELIHOOD OF CONFUSION® is a registered trademark for blogs, and it's mine. And this is my very special privacy policy.
And see the bottom of this sidebar for the disclaimer... in case you're one of those.
Follow @likely2confuse on Twitter
Is LIKELIHOOD OF CONFUSION® really all that? Rankings-wise? Is it really one of the top law blogs in the galaxy?
It is, for what that's worth.
As of right now, here are the latest rankings via:
It's easy it is to game almost any ranking system, not that I've tried to. As such. These are just what they are.
THIS BLOG IS ONLY A BLOG, NOT LEGAL ADVICE. IT IS IN PART AN ADVERTISEMENT FOR LEGAL SERVICES BY ME, RONALD D. COLEMAN, BUT I AM NOT YOUR LAWYER. YOU ARE NOT MY CLIENT. JUST WALK BESIDE ME AND BE MY FRIEND.
*The term maven is used to mean "wise guy" here and is not meant to suggest that I am certified or otherwise authorized under bar rules to claim "expertise" in any field of legal practice. But try me.
