Testing the Anti-Sedition Act

(Dead links replaced on reposting.)

I’ve argued tiresomely (heh) that the problem with the McCain-Feingold Anti-Sedition Act is that it gives a privileged position to one kind of commercial speech — the kind made by commercial enterprises that happen to be in the media business — above other kinds of commercial speech, e.g., advertising.

I’ve also argued that it’s a big mistake for bloggers to be bought off, opinion-wise, by a carve-out exempting the Internet from this sort of regulation while leaving other media / advertising restrictions in place.

Now someone’s testing that hypothesis, and the constitutionality of this dubious distinction, by buying a cable news station for the explicit purpose of political speech (the purest First Amendment interest of all). (Hat tip to the light-on-permalinks Mickey Kaus.) We had already asked how this would play out if a blogger ran for office.  Perhaps something will give as it plays out the other way around.

(Cross-posted on Dean’s World.)

UPDATE:   Over three years later, it doesn’t appear that anything has been resolved on this issue.


Tags: ,

Author:Ron Coleman

I write this blog.


  1. LIKELIHOOD OF CONFUSION » Blog Archive » None dare call it speech - July 24, 2006

    […] Money, that is.  It’s just that some people just don’t want to talk about what they’re doing with it.  Thanks, Senator McCain! […]

  2. Dean's World - July 25, 2006

    None dare call it speech…

    Money, that is. It’s just that some pe……

  3. Paranoid? Try this. « Likelihood of Success - October 20, 2008

    […] about a willingness to use the state to enforce opinion from Barack Obama (not that John McCain is blameless)… and the mainstream media’s contempt for citizen journalism… and the […]