The other side of anonymity

Originally posted 2009-02-24 13:52:54. Republished by Blog Post Promoter

unknown-comicWhat happens when it’s the plaintiff that is anonymous, and wants to stay that way?

email

Author:Ron Coleman

I write this blog.

Subscribe

There are all kinds of social media formats to subscribe or otherwise follow the adventures of LIKELIHOOD OF CONFUSION®. Or see the posts-by-email option below.

9 Responses to “The other side of anonymity”

  1. Joel G. MacMull
    February 24, 2009 at 7:14 pm #

    I’ll take “What is unconstitutional for $600, Alex.”

  2. February 24, 2009 at 8:46 pm #

    Anonymity is permissible for Plaintiffs in very limited circumstances.

  3. February 25, 2009 at 4:38 pm #

    How is one ever supposed to prove defamation without actually revealing who they are or directly citing the specific defamatory material (which presumably does reveal who they are)?

    • February 25, 2009 at 5:25 pm #

      I am assuming they do so by utilizing sealed pleadings and a non-public trial, which of course is extraordinary to say the least.

  4. Greg
    February 25, 2009 at 8:47 pm #

    Roe v. Wade

Trackbacks/Pingbacks

  1. Ron Coleman - February 24, 2009

    LIKELY / CONFUSION The other side of anonymity: What happens when it’s the plaintiff tha.. http://tinyurl.com/asstr2

  2. Steve Imparl - February 25, 2009

    The other side of anonymity http://tinyurl.com/asstr2

  3. overlawyered - February 25, 2009

    Ron Coleman: “What happens when it’s the plaintiff that is anonymous, and wants to stay that way?” http://bit.ly/EYO6D

  4. February 26 roundup - February 26, 2009

    […] Defamation suits: “What happens when it’s the plaintiff that is anonymous, and wants to stay that way?” [Ron Coleman] […]

Leave a Reply