Crips as a brand? Why not? I mean, sure, maybe

At the Duets Blog, Draeke Weseman asks the potentially dangerous question:

Draeke is all up for a good laugh — WITH the Crips of course, not at them — but asks four serious questions about the notorious gang’s effort to ramp up a brand:

Considering everything that went into the episode, and the seriousness of the effort, I was left scratching my head over the obvious, and perhaps true-to-life, startup oversight:  where’s the trademark lawyer?  I spotted at least four issues where a good trademark lawyer could have really helped.

First problem, well – not really a problem, just a thing we might want to talk about. Draeke did not say “problem”! I have no problem with the Crips and I am sure Draeke doesn’t either. But in the “just saying” category, look at this:

Crip-a-Cola. Haha

Yup, there’s a circle-R on Crip-a-Cola, but there’s not trademark registration. That bugs everyone in this racket, and we’ve all written about it at one point or another. Thankfully for us we don’t have to tell the Crips why this is a problem because we have Draeke.

Draeke Weseman, who is not me, I am just saying what he said

Draeke goes through a handful of other, um, slight details the fellows might find interesting. So there’s no reason at all for me to repeat them here. Because he said them on that other blog. This one — which happens to be the best trademark and branding blog, so why would you think it would be on some other blog, like mine?

By Ron Coleman

I write this blog.

2 thoughts on “Crips as a brand? Why not? I mean, sure, maybe”
  1. @Matthew Crisp-If there was no U.S. military…’s a very real possibility that the Axis Powers would have prevailed in WWII. The Soviet Union had its hands full with Germany after the invasion of the Soviet Union. They could not have handled a Japanese invasion in the east. Without U.S. Lend-Lease material and money……..and the fact that the Pacific War was overwhelmingly an American-Japanese conflict…………if you take the U.S. out of this equation……the world could be a much different place today…….and not a better one despite the challenges the world faces now.Additionally, if not the U.S. and its military…..who would have countered the Communists around the globe? Who would have pushed back the North Koreans and Chinese on the Korean Peninsula? Somebody else commented here that the “Domino Theory”…..Southeast Asia falling like dominos to the Communists never happened. The same with Latin America. As if these beliefs were lies. These were possibilities which seemed completely plausible given the geopolitical composition of the world at the time. Marx felt that Communism would overcome capitalism……that history ordained it…..a forgone conclusion…….that was a farfetched theory, not terribly plausible …..yet tens of millions bought into it…….but not true! You say we had a relationship with Bin Laden. Absolutely false! Bin Laden’s father……yes, but Osama Bin Laden…no. If you are going to assert something like this furnish real evidence from reputable sources…….ie: the National Security Archive or some other comparable source. Additionally, your comments on 9/11, Boston Marathon Bombing..etc… being possibly “false flag” operations by the federal government……………well, I’ll leave it for others to judge for themselves……but that instantly discredits people in my eyes.LikeLike

  2. […] At DuetsBlog, we never shy away from sharing our opinion.  It’s part of what makes us not Dr. No.  For over ten years, this has included opinions about interesting trademarks, non-traditional trademarks, boring trademarks, and controversial trademarks, and those are just from me, as well as our opinions on the opinions of others (Ron Coleman, especially), and we love when others share their opinions of our opinions (Ron Coleman, especially). […]

Comments are closed.