Skip to content
  • Home
  • Gavin McInnes v. SPLC
  • Solas v. Town of South Kingstown
  • Contact
  • More
    • Disney v DeSantis decision
    • Carson Griffith vs. The Daily Beast
    • Corporate Censorship in Social Media and a Role for the States
    • Opposition brief of Gavin McInnes to motion to dismiss by SPLC
    • Pardon Ari Teman – My letter to the President
    • I’m high-ranked and I know it
    • My September 11th
    • The Endless Summer: Student Lawyer magazine, March 1989
    • Asymmetric Cultural Warfare
    • The Fashion Law blogger disclosures
    • S & L Vitamins / Sagarin v. Australian Gold / Designer Skin
    • Ronald D. Coleman | Litigation Lawyer
    • BOBOV trademark protest letter
    • Blawg Review #2 (April 17, 2005)
    • Ron Coleman panel presentations — Last 10 as of July 14, 2017
  • Standards for likelihood of confusion
    • Likelihood of confusion in the Third Circuit
    • Likelihood of confusion: 2d Circuit
    • Likelihood of confusion in the Federal Circuit
  • Publications
    • Play-Doh’s trademark registration passes the smell test
    • Statutory damages in copyright cases
    • Social Media and Proving Secondary Meaning
    • Bully for Who? How trademark bullying works
    • Motions to Dismiss the Complaint
    • Bloggers, Journalists, Reporting and Privilege
    • Slants, Redskins and other “Disparaging” Trademarks
    • New York’s Declaratory Judgment Insurance Trap
    • Trademark, Copyright, and the Internet: Time to Return Balance to Civil Litigation
    • Hands off blogs: Mandatory disclosure of “blogola”?
    • Policy and Constitutional Problems with Section 2(a) of the Lanham Act
    • “Initial Interest Confusion”: Compounding the Error
    • Prudential Standing: Who is ‘Any Person’ Under the Lanham Act?
    • When Young Lawyers Meet Ancient Law
    • Managing Risk: Litigation Prophylaxis in High-Tech Agreements
    • Hacker with a White Hat
    • Depositions and Wrongful Profits in Infringement Cases: Cornering Your Prey with Rule 30(b)(6)
    • A Theory of Trademarks in the Blog Era
    • Court Nixes Fees for Fact Witnesses
    • Copycats on the Superhighway
    • Civil Disclosures (ABA Journal)
  • Privacy Policy
  • Video

LIKELIHOOD OF CONFUSION™

Lawyer Ron Coleman on brands, the Internet & free speech

LIKELIHOOD OF CONFUSION™

Lawyer Ron Coleman on brands, the Internet & free speech

  • Home
  • Video
  • Publications
    • Play-Doh’s trademark registration passes the smell test
    • Social Media and Proving Secondary Meaning
    • Slants, Redskins and other “Disparaging” Trademarks
    • Bully for Who? How trademark bullying works
    • Copycats on the Superhighway
    • Prudential Standing: Who is ‘Any Person’ Under the Lanham Act?
    • Hacker with a White Hat
    • Trademark, Copyright, and the Internet: Time to Return Balance to Civil Litigation
    • Hands off blogs: Mandatory disclosure of “blogola”?
    • Bloggers, Journalists, Reporting and Privilege
    • “Initial Interest Confusion”: Compounding the Error
  • More
    • Privacy Policy
    • Opposition brief of Gavin McInnes to motion to dismiss by SPLC
    • Disney v DeSantis decision
    • Statutory damages in copyright cases
    • A Theory of Trademarks in the Blog Era
    • Managing Risk: Litigation Prophylaxis in High-Tech Agreements
    • I’m high-ranked and I know it
    • The Endless Summer: Student Lawyer magazine, March 1989
    • Asymmetric Cultural Warfare
    • Blawg Review #2 (April 17, 2005)
    • Copycats on the Superhighway
    • The Endless Summer: Student Lawyer magazine, March 1989
  • Motions to Dismiss
  • Bio and Contact
    • Home
    • Distinctiveness
Use as a Trademark

The Trademark Singularity: Part 1

Ron Coleman Feb 20, 2020 0 Comments

Well, trademark use is all the rage in trademark thinking and commentary now, and well it should be. It goes, after all, to the heart of the endeavor, and I…

Likelihood of Confusion

Strong to save

Ron Coleman Dec 18, 2018 0 Comments

Everyone knows that distinctiveness can be inherent or acquired, and that some kinds of trademarks — product-configuration trade dress, notably — can “never” be inherently distinctive. But not everyone knows…

Trademarks and trademark law

Lapping up the trademark law

Ron Coleman Aug 25, 2016 1 Comments

The question: Trade Dress Trick Question: Is this laptop shape #distinctive?#trademarks pic.twitter.com/Wj23Sz8kxt — Ed Timberlake (@TimberlakeLaw) August 25, 2016 (Remember non-professionals: “Distinctiveness” is the core of a trademark’s existence. It…

Costumes and Clothing

Best of 2008: Tackiness not grounds for refusal to register

Ron Coleman Jan 22, 2015 0 Comments

Otherwise, why would John Welch be reporting this appeal?: December 4, 2008 – 10 AM: In re Chippendales USA, LLC, Serial No. 78666598

Brand Management and Branding

Best of 2010: Dough, a dear

Ron Coleman Dec 31, 2010 4 Comments

First posted August 11, 2010. The Stay-Puft Marshmallow Man wreaked some havoc in his time, but who would have thought that his inspiration — the Pillsbury Doughboy — would act…

Brand Management and Branding Trademarks and trademark law

Best of 2010: If you see something… it’s probably “trademarked”

Ron Coleman Dec 24, 2010 0 Comments

First published on May 12, 2010. A while ago, while obsessing about New York’s Metropolitan Transportation Authority and its obsession with turning what might have once merely been viewed as…

Trademarks and trademark law

In a family way

Ron Coleman Nov 11, 2010 3 Comments

I’ve written, as is my wont, at great length regarding my skepticism about the “family of trademarks” concept. Well, once you’ve digested that, you may want to head over to…

Trademarks and trademark law

Trademark attorneys shaken AND stirred over Walther product configuration TM ruling

Ron Coleman Oct 29, 2010 5 Comments

Who says the Commissioner of Trademarks is “Dr. No”? To the contrary, some trademark registration applications Only Live Twice — and that’s quite enough. John Welch, The Man with the…

Costumes and Clothing

Chippendales cuffs-and-collar TM “distinctiveness” claim goes “gently” into that dark night

Ron Coleman Oct 3, 2010 16 Comments

Reuters reports on a high-class trademark story I’ve been following since my own dancing days: The male erotic dancer company Chippendales stumbled on Friday when an appeals court ruled that…

Brand Management and Branding Trademarks and trademark law

Dough, a dear

Ron Coleman Aug 11, 2010 9 Comments

The Stay-Puft Marshmallow Man wreaked some havoc in his time, but who would have thought that his inspiration — the Pillsbury Doughboy — would act the part of a veritable…

Brand Management and Branding Trademarks and trademark law

If you see something… it’s probably “trademarked”

Ron Coleman May 12, 2010 15 Comments

A while ago, while obsessing about New York’s Metropolitan Transportation Authority and its obsession with turning what might have once merely been viewed as functional municipal signage or insignia into…

Trademarks and trademark law

Likelihood of — well, no, actually. Not.

Ron Coleman Feb 10, 2010 1 Comments

At least in some parts of the country, LIKELIHOOD OF CONFUSION is something judges actually sometimes don’t find. Out there, for example. No, the other side — yeah. The left.…

Trademarks and trademark law

Web 2.0, but nothing’s changed

Ron Coleman Jan 28, 2010 5 Comments

Remember the silliness over the attempt by a certain attorney to secure trademark rights for CYBERLAWYER? The notable part about how that went down was that the foolishness was abated…

Costumes and Clothing

Chippendales shimmies up to the Circuit

Ron Coleman Dec 22, 2009 1 Comments

Hot (if unlike LIKELIHOOD OF CONFUSION® you go for that sort of thing) off the presses — here’s the appellate brief in the Chippendale’s appeal of the Trademark Trial and…

Posts pagination

1 2

Next Page »

The question of whether consumers are likely to be confused is the signal inquiry that determines if a trademark infringement claim is valid. I write here about trademark law, copyright law, brands, free speech (mostly as it relates to the Internet and social media). That may sound like a lot, but it's just a blog.

This is attorney advertising. Lawyer Ronald D. Coleman is admitted to practice in New York and New Jersey.

For more information click here.

You Missed

Free Expression Section 2(a)

Ten years later…

Everything else

How to Escape the Clutches of Someone with Narcissism

LIKELIHOOD OF CONFUSION®

New video series: Law Learnin’ Wednesdays

Use as a Trademark

Trademark: “From The River to the Sea”?

LIKELIHOOD OF CONFUSION™

Lawyer Ron Coleman on brands, the Internet & free speech

© Copyright 2022 Blogus. All Rights Reserved. by Themeansar

  • Legal standards for likelihood of confusion
Loading Comments...