Redskins trademark | LIKELIHOOD OF CONFUSION™

The Redskins appeal brief in Pro-Football v. Blackhorse

Posted on September 20, 2019 by Ron Coleman

Originally posted 2015-10-31 20:54:47. Republished by Blog Post Promoter

Section 2(a)

“Indian givers” (part 1)

Posted on March 29, 2016 by Ron Coleman

Originally posted 2015-02-16 17:37:02. Republished by Blog Post PromoterFor years I’ve been complaining that so much of the excitement in intellectual property law jurisprudence these days […]

Section 2(a)

“Indian givers” (part 2)

Posted on March 21, 2016 by Ron Coleman

Originally posted 2015-02-17 08:00:11. Republished by Blog Post Promoter [Note: This post was written before the December 22, 2015 Federal Circuit opinion in In re […]

Section 2(a)

43(a)? It’s not for me to say

Posted on January 7, 2016 by Ron Coleman

I’m kind of tired of In re Tam also. But I have been a bit surprised that there has not been a more discussion, or […]

Section 2(a)

Another bad season for the Redskins

Posted on July 8, 2015 by Ron Coleman

The Eastern District of Virginia has ruled (link to opinion here) on the summary judgment motions in Pro Football v. Blackhorse in the NFL’s appeal to the District […]

Section 2(a)

B&B Hardware: Beyond Nuts and Bolts

Posted on March 24, 2015 by Ron Coleman

I’d promised I’d wait on this, but I couldn’t, and you’ll see why. Here’s my take on today’s Supreme Court decision in B&B Hardware v. Hargis […]

Likelihood of Confusion

Indian givers (part 3)

Posted on February 18, 2015 by Ron Coleman

Part one and part two of this three-part post were published earlier this week. When the PTO’s decision revoking the REDSKINS registrations was affirmed by […]

Section 2(a)