Skip to content
  • Home
  • Gavin McInnes v. SPLC
  • Solas v. Town of South Kingstown
  • Contact
  • More
    • Disney v DeSantis decision
    • Carson Griffith vs. The Daily Beast
    • Corporate Censorship in Social Media and a Role for the States
    • Opposition brief of Gavin McInnes to motion to dismiss by SPLC
    • Pardon Ari Teman – My letter to the President
    • I’m high-ranked and I know it
    • My September 11th
    • The Endless Summer: Student Lawyer magazine, March 1989
    • Asymmetric Cultural Warfare
    • The Fashion Law blogger disclosures
    • S & L Vitamins / Sagarin v. Australian Gold / Designer Skin
    • Ronald D. Coleman | Litigation Lawyer
    • BOBOV trademark protest letter
    • Blawg Review #2 (April 17, 2005)
    • Ron Coleman panel presentations — Last 10 as of July 14, 2017
  • Standards for likelihood of confusion
    • Likelihood of confusion in the Third Circuit
    • Likelihood of confusion: 2d Circuit
    • Likelihood of confusion in the Federal Circuit
  • Publications
    • Play-Doh’s trademark registration passes the smell test
    • Statutory damages in copyright cases
    • Social Media and Proving Secondary Meaning
    • Bully for Who? How trademark bullying works
    • Motions to Dismiss the Complaint
    • Bloggers, Journalists, Reporting and Privilege
    • Slants, Redskins and other “Disparaging” Trademarks
    • New York’s Declaratory Judgment Insurance Trap
    • Trademark, Copyright, and the Internet: Time to Return Balance to Civil Litigation
    • Hands off blogs: Mandatory disclosure of “blogola”?
    • Policy and Constitutional Problems with Section 2(a) of the Lanham Act
    • “Initial Interest Confusion”: Compounding the Error
    • Prudential Standing: Who is ‘Any Person’ Under the Lanham Act?
    • When Young Lawyers Meet Ancient Law
    • Managing Risk: Litigation Prophylaxis in High-Tech Agreements
    • Hacker with a White Hat
    • Depositions and Wrongful Profits in Infringement Cases: Cornering Your Prey with Rule 30(b)(6)
    • A Theory of Trademarks in the Blog Era
    • Court Nixes Fees for Fact Witnesses
    • Copycats on the Superhighway
    • Civil Disclosures (ABA Journal)
  • Privacy Policy
  • Video

LIKELIHOOD OF CONFUSION™

Lawyer Ron Coleman on brands, the Internet & free speech

LIKELIHOOD OF CONFUSION™

Lawyer Ron Coleman on brands, the Internet & free speech

  • Home
  • Video
  • Publications
    • Play-Doh’s trademark registration passes the smell test
    • Social Media and Proving Secondary Meaning
    • Slants, Redskins and other “Disparaging” Trademarks
    • Bully for Who? How trademark bullying works
    • Copycats on the Superhighway
    • Prudential Standing: Who is ‘Any Person’ Under the Lanham Act?
    • Hacker with a White Hat
    • Trademark, Copyright, and the Internet: Time to Return Balance to Civil Litigation
    • Hands off blogs: Mandatory disclosure of “blogola”?
    • Bloggers, Journalists, Reporting and Privilege
    • “Initial Interest Confusion”: Compounding the Error
  • More
    • Privacy Policy
    • Opposition brief of Gavin McInnes to motion to dismiss by SPLC
    • Disney v DeSantis decision
    • Statutory damages in copyright cases
    • A Theory of Trademarks in the Blog Era
    • Managing Risk: Litigation Prophylaxis in High-Tech Agreements
    • I’m high-ranked and I know it
    • The Endless Summer: Student Lawyer magazine, March 1989
    • Asymmetric Cultural Warfare
    • Blawg Review #2 (April 17, 2005)
    • Copycats on the Superhighway
    • The Endless Summer: Student Lawyer magazine, March 1989
  • Motions to Dismiss
  • Bio and Contact
    • Home
    • Trademarks and trademark law
Free Expression

Amicus Brief filed in Vans v. MSCHF

Ron Coleman Jun 24, 2022 0 Comments

This is an important trademarks / free speech case. I got in on an edge of it!

Secondary Liability

Ohio State v. Redbubble – Strategy scores in overtime

Ron Coleman Apr 14, 2021 1 Comments

So it seems that was a tactical call by the OSU team, otherwise known as the Attorney General of the State of Ohio: Let's make the strong case for direct…

Litigation

Lucky Brand decision: Dale Cendali makes her own luck

Ron Coleman May 15, 2020 0 Comments

Yet another Supreme Court trademark decision yesterday, May 14, 2020: Lucky Brand Dungarees, Inc. v. Marcel Fashions Grp., Inc., No. 18-1086 (S. Ct. May 14, 2020). Supreme Court Rules That…

IP Overreaching

Trademarks: Famous is as famous does

Ron Coleman Sep 6, 2018 1 Comments

My latest paper offers a simple idea to get trademark owners to stop suing parodists, satirists, and other expressive users: make evidence of such independent referential uses of a mark…

Litigation

Please plead me

Ron Coleman Sep 1, 2015 2 Comments

Everyone knows about copyright preemption. How about trademarks? Pamela Chestak has a great post that explains why yes one, and no the other. First, a refresher on preemption in copyright.…

TTAB Practice

Best of 2009: Keeping it real — the ultimate use in commerce

Ron Coleman Jan 26, 2015 0 Comments

This was first posted on May 7, 2009. The TTABlog® reports, again, on the fraud issue, but that’s not what interests me here so much this time. Rather, it’s the…

Costumes and Clothing

Best of 2008: Tackiness not grounds for refusal to register

Ron Coleman Jan 22, 2015 0 Comments

Otherwise, why would John Welch be reporting this appeal?: December 4, 2008 – 10 AM: In re Chippendales USA, LLC, Serial No. 78666598

Brand Management and Branding

Best of 2007: That’s a wrap

Ron Coleman Jan 20, 2015 0 Comments

Published on April 16, 2007. Forget about the IP rights in those MTA symbols — you can probably use them however you want, now. (Remember to read my disclaimer on…

Genericness and Trademarks

The not so bright line

Ron Coleman May 13, 2013 0 Comments

The preamble of the Lanham Act Section 2 is followed by six lower-case–lettered sections, the fifth of which contains four separately numbered “grounds” on which it is permissible to refuse…

Fashion Law

Best of 2012: Fees, won’t you stay

Ron Coleman Dec 21, 2012 0 Comments

Originally posted March 30, 2012. The Second Circuit, just yesterday (March 29, 2012) has issued an opinion called Louis Vuitton v. Ly USA, Inc. (08-4483-cv(L)) sure to bring joy to…

Keyword Advertising

Search for resolution

Ron Coleman Nov 7, 2012 0 Comments

It’s two posts in one (I like to pull that off when I can), not even counting this one: Mike Masnick on Eric Goldman on the settlement of the Google…

Enforcement Fashion Law

Fees, won’t you stay

Ron Coleman Mar 30, 2012 7 Comments

The Second Circuit, just yesterday (March 29, 2012) has issued an opinion called Louis Vuitton v. Ly USA, Inc. (08-4483-cv(L)) sure to bring joy to the hearts of trademark counterfeiting…

Fashion Law

Louis Louis

Ron Coleman Mar 13, 2012 12 Comments

Steve Baird makes some great points about the Louis Vuittion / student activities flier kerfuffle: There has been quite a flap surrounding the poster and invitation used by the University…

Law Practice and Profession

Not my money

Ron Coleman Feb 9, 2012 18 Comments

Last June, blogging about my presentation to the Copyright Society on the Righthaven litigation, I wrote the following: This brings us to the issue of mass enforcement a la RIAA…

Posts pagination

1 2 … 16

Next Page »

The question of whether consumers are likely to be confused is the signal inquiry that determines if a trademark infringement claim is valid. I write here about trademark law, copyright law, brands, free speech (mostly as it relates to the Internet and social media). That may sound like a lot, but it's just a blog.

This is attorney advertising. Lawyer Ronald D. Coleman is admitted to practice in New York and New Jersey.

For more information click here.

You Missed

Free Expression Section 2(a)

Ten years later…

Everything else

How to Escape the Clutches of Someone with Narcissism

LIKELIHOOD OF CONFUSION®

New video series: Law Learnin’ Wednesdays

Use as a Trademark

Trademark: “From The River to the Sea”?

LIKELIHOOD OF CONFUSION™

Lawyer Ron Coleman on brands, the Internet & free speech

© Copyright 2022 Blogus. All Rights Reserved. by Themeansar

  • Legal standards for likelihood of confusion
Loading Comments...