It rejects the stupid and unconstitutional argument that “commercial use” under the Lanham Act’s dilution provisions can be found where there is simply “diversion.”
By Ron Coleman
I write this blog.
Lawyer Ron Coleman on brands, the Internet & free speech
It rejects the stupid and unconstitutional argument that “commercial use” under the Lanham Act’s dilution provisions can be found where there is simply “diversion.”
I write this blog.