It rejects the stupid and unconstitutional argument that “commercial use” under the Lanham Act’s dilution provisions can be found where there is simply “diversion.”
Originally posted 2013-07-10 14:26:04. Republished by Blog Post Promoter
Lawyer Ron Coleman on brands, the Internet & free speech
It rejects the stupid and unconstitutional argument that “commercial use” under the Lanham Act’s dilution provisions can be found where there is simply “diversion.”
Originally posted 2013-07-10 14:26:04. Republished by Blog Post Promoter