Skip to content

LIKELIHOOD OF CONFUSION™

LIKELIHOOD OF CONFUSION™

Ron Coleman on the law affecting brands, the Internet & free speech

Search for:

Legal standards for likelihood of confusion

Home
Video
Publications
More
Motions to Dismiss
Bio and Contact

Bayer v. Belmora (the “FLANAX case”) – Petition for rehearing en banc

Posted on September 20, 2019Author Ron Coleman

Written by: Ron Coleman

Originally posted 2016-05-17 10:32:04. Republished by Blog Post Promoter

Share this:

Click to share on Twitter (Opens in new window)
Click to share on Facebook (Opens in new window)
Click to share on LinkedIn (Opens in new window)
Click to share on Pinterest (Opens in new window)
Click to email this to a friend (Opens in new window)
Click to print (Opens in new window)

Related

Category: Trademarks and trademark law Tag: Famous Marks Doctrine, Flanax, Well-Known Marks

You may also like:

Belmora’s U.S. Supreme Court certiorari reply brief in the FLANAX case
Reply appeal brief – Belmora v. Bayer (“FLANAX”)
Petition for certiorari in the FLANAX case
Bayer v. Belmora: 4th Circuit, FLANAX Round 2

Ron Coleman

I write this blog. View all posts by Ron Coleman

Post navigation

Previous PostHow Supreme Skateboard plays the edge

Next PostSoft IP landing

LinkedIn
Twitter
YouTube
Instagram
Corporate Censorship in Social Media and a Role for the States

Ron Coleman of the DHILLON LAW GROUP

Click the pic for more information - admitted in New York and New Jersey

This blog

The question of whether consumers are likely to be confused is the signal inquiry that determines if a trademark infringement claim is valid. I write here about trademark law, copyright law, brands, free speech (mostly as it relates to the Internet and social media). That may sound like a lot, but it's just a blog.

PODCAST

Commercial, Trademark and Free Speech Litigation at DHILLON LAW GROUP

LIKELIHOOD OF ACCUMULATION

LIKELIHOOD OF ACCUMULATION

CATEGORIES (Still in progress…)

CATEGORIES (Still in progress…)

DISCLAIMER

THIS BLOG IS ONLY A BLOG, NOT LEGAL ADVICE. IT IS IN PART AN ADVERTISEMENT FOR LEGAL SERVICES BY RONALD D. COLEMAN, AN ATTORNEY ADMITTED IN NEW YORK AND NEW JERSEY ONLY, WHO IS NOT YOUR LAWYER. YOU ARE NOT HIS CLIENT. JUST WALK BESIDE HIM AND BE HIS FRIEND.

This is my very special privacy policy.

THIS WEBSITE MAY BE CONSIDERED ATTORNEY ADVERTISING, DAMN IT

Tweets by likely2confuse

© 2021 LIKELIHOOD OF CONFUSION™

Send to Email Address Your Name Your Email Address

Cancel

Post was not sent - check your email addresses!

Email check failed, please try again

Sorry, your blog cannot share posts by email.